I would like to state that I am hesitant to post political content - not that I think it irrelevant, but only that I am unlearned. This is an area of study for me.
At any rate, here is a decent article on the President's comments regarding the Ground Zero Mosque.
The question that is at the forefront of my mind now is, "Do people have the right to practice their religion?"
This is a loaded question, that cannot be made "clear" (quoting the President) without much discussion, definition and clarification. Questions must be answered, like "What religion are you referring to?" and "What are the practices of that religion?" I find it very interesting that no one seems to clarify comments of this nature with direct exegetical references. In this case, comments concerning Islam from the Koran.
I wonder if the President would make the same comments if the New Hebrides of the 18th century were wanting to 'practice their religion' in the United States? In doing so, he would be promoting cannibalism. Surely they would not have the right.
Now, the question should be raised as to whether Islamic religious practices are dangerous to society or not. Again, I am puzzled as to why the religious practices are not publicly defined, with clear citations from the Koran. Instead, we get an over generalized statement, "they have the right." The cited article (along with Glen Beck this morning) brought this very statement under the critical light of the Constitution. At least with the New Hebrides, I would hesitate to say that everyone has a right to practice their religion.
Over generalized comments leave many in the dark regarding particulars. And we all know that darkness is the favored arena of evil practices. 9/11 left many in the dark regarding the nature of Islam. Is it a peaceful religion or not? I have my views. But, I am quite disappointed that the President has not provided any light of clarification and comfort regarding the understandable confusion that surrounds us.
Simply put, if Islam has the right to practice their religion, please show us clearly what those practices are. Religious practices necessarily affect others. Therefore, rights regarding religious practices must not be protected under some ambiguous blanket. Rather, each should be scrutinized and studied through the Constitutional lens, to see whether it is worthy of the right.
Note: I am more than willing to be corrected on my views here. If you see any error in my logic or thinking, please inform me.
Note: I am more than willing to be corrected on my views here. If you see any error in my logic or thinking, please inform me.